Sony Xperia 1 IV
256 GB, Violet, 6.50", Dual SIM, 12 Mpx, 5GProduct details
The Xperia 1 IV offers unparalleled video creation and sharing capabilities. It is the first smartphone that can shoot 4K HDR videos at 120 frames per second with all lenses. This lets you unleash your creativity and bring ideas and visions to life in exceptional quality. Sony is known in the industry for its outstanding AF capabilities. Eye AF detects the eyes of people and animals and orients itself to them when subjects are moving. This makes videos more vivid than ever. Sony is known in the industry for its outstanding AF features. Eye AF detects the eyes of people and animals and uses them to guide subjects as they move. This makes videos more vivid than ever. The Xperia 1 IV was developed in collaboration with professional e-sports gamers with the goal of providing a perfect gaming experience with maximum chances of winning. Used as official equipment in the professional gaming scene, the Xperia delivers the speed, power and reliability required for top-level mobile gaming. With a range of features developed in collaboration with professional eSports players, the Xperia 1 IV is designed to meet the demands of mobile gaming at the highest level.
Memory | 12 GB |
Storage capacity | 256 GB |
Display size (inches) | 6.50" |
Image resolution | 1644 x 3840 pixels |
Operating system | Android |
Capacity | 5000 mAh |
Number of cameras | Quad Camera |
Item number | 20834067 |
Here you can see the lowest price of the day over time. Learn more
Reviews & Ratings
Statutory warranty score
How often does a product of this brand in the «Smartphones» category have a defect within the first 24 months?
Source: Galaxus- 15.Google2,2 %
- 15.TIM2,2 %
- 17.Sony2,4 %
- 18.Cat2,7 %
- 18.Crosscall2,7 %
Statutory warranty case duration
How many working days on average does it take to process a warranty claim from when it arrives at the service centre until it’s back with the customer?
Source: Galaxus- 21.ASUS13 days
- 21.Fairphone13 days
- 23.Motorola19 days
- 24.Cat20 days
- 25.Sony21 days
Return rate
How often is a product of this brand in the «Smartphones» category returned?
Source: Galaxus- 19.Motorola4,5 %
- 20.Oukitel4,6 %
- 21.Sony4,7 %
- 22.TCL4,9 %
- 23.HTC5,1 %
- Very high working speed
- Camera with very good image stabilisation
- Slow loading
- somewhat insecure facial recognition
The predecessor to the current top model also offers a powerful camera.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e1129/e112998a6886e0bc70d5a51e226aba10b7fc7a30" alt="techstage.de Logo"
- chic design and great workmanship
- Basically good camera with optical zoom
- Super fast and lots of (expandable!) memory
- Much too expensive - and then without charger and cable
- Battery too weak
- only 2 major updates
Making phone calls, sending messages, surfing the internet - for most people, everyday life is hardly conceivable without a smartphone. It is therefore all the more important to be able to rely on the devices. The Stiftung Warentest smartphone test answers the question of which model is the test winner and which ones lack stability or basic functions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fef81/fef81450621428c8561df4530b0e3ae8f618b4a2" alt="Tariftipp Logo"
- Stylish, handy housing with water/dust protection
- Sharp 6.5" OLED 4K HDR 21:9 Cinema Display
- Double Tele & Wide Angle plus OIS & EIS
- Stereo Speakers & Dolby Atmos & HiRes Audio
- Fast-charging battery with wireless charging
- Fast CPU, excellent equipment
- great camera
- short term
- too short an update promise
Although the Xperia 10 IV costs just over a third of Sony's top model, the devices share a lot of advantages (IP68, eSIM, expandable memory, jack socket) and one shortcoming: the too-short updates. Beyond that, both devices have their own strengths. The cheaper 10 IV runs for an extremely long time and even breaks a runtime record on the c't test bench - the 1 IV can't keep up with it by far...
Both the main camera and the super-wide-angle module leave a positive impression in the test. In the JPEG setting, they come close to the rating "very good". In RAW format, both improve in terms of fine detail, but also have more noise. Although no QUAD technology is used, Sony relies instead on large 12 megapixel sensors...