
Philips Speed Pro Max Aqua Plus
Philips Speed Pro Max Aqua Plus
General conditions:
3 1/2 rooms, laminate and stone floors, various short pile runners, one small high pile carpet.
Conclusion: I haven't given away the conventional vacuum cleaner (you know, the one you pull behind you by the hose and let crash into every piece of furniture) yet, because the new one was actually meant for "hurti schnäu" vacuuming. But the Philips is too good, too thorough and too fast for that. Where the 360° nozzle can't reach, the normal vacuum can't reach either. The only thing the nozzle can't do is the pile carpet - but the Aqua nozzle can, hehe. Just run it over the shaggy rug without the water tank and bang, problem solved.
Speaking of the Aqua nozzle... Moist pick-up works really well with it! And in contrast to other systems, the effort required to clean the nozzle afterwards is not worth mentioning.
If you have to interrupt your work for a moment, it's a shame that the vacuum has no stand function and you have to place it somewhere or lay it on the floor. It is also a pity that the LED lighting is not just a gimmick, but sheds more light on the dirty secrets of the floor than one would like.
The most awkward thing about this Philips cordless vacuum cleaner is its name "XC8347/01"...
"Nimble weasel" would be better ;-)
Pro
Contra
I wanted to replace my old dyson, with something new, and actualy i am sastified.
Pro
Contra
Aku is good for 100m2 without having to charge again
Pro
Contra
Pro
Contra
If the Dyson is too expensive for you, this is the perfect alternative.
Pro
Contra
Pro
Contra
6 out of 127 reviews