All fooled by the 4K scam
Background information

All fooled by the 4K scam

Luca Fontana
16.11.2018
Translation: machine translated
Pictures: Thomas Kunz

In their bombastic advertising campaigns, manufacturers tend to promise more pixels than there actually are in their 4K TVs. The problem is, nobody seems to mind.

Marketing ploy or scam? Manufacturers are selling us their ultra HD TVs as if they all had 4K definition. That's not true, but that doesn't stop them adding those two little signs which, when they're together, seem to have magical powers.

"4K" is presumably a better seller than the term "ultra HD".

However, manufacturers get away with this big lie, without anyone batting an eyelid. That's probably because most people don't know that 4K is not the same as ultra HD (UHD).

Let's talk definition

If the shortcuts full HD (FHD), ultra HD (UHD), 4K and 8K mean nothing to you, you should know that they describe the definition of the image. They serve no other purpose than to indicate the number of pixels on the screen. This is important, because pixels reproduce an image and the more there are, the sharper the image will be.

Until a few years ago, a conventional TV offered a definition of 1920 x 1080 pixels, full HD for short. In practice, this means that:

  • each horizontal line counts 1920 pixels,
  • each vertical line counts 1080.

Multiplying these two numbers gives the total number of pixels on the entire screen surface. That is, 2,073,600 pixels for a full HD TV. Today's televisions, mainly from 55 inches upwards, have more than eight million pixels. This is known as ultra HD definition and the screen is made up of 3840 x 2160 pixels.

The pixels in the width multiplieds by the pixels in the height give the total number
The pixels in the width multiplieds by the pixels in the height give the total number
Source: Luca Fontana

The following is crucial to our "4K isn't like UHD" debate: Hollywood films don't have the same aspect ratio as TV movies.

Updated 20.11.2018, 9:52am: 4K is used in digital cinemas and generally corresponds - assertions are absolutely impossible because of this damn variable - to a definition of 4096 x 2160 pixels. This gives an aspect ratio slightly greater than 17:9. The image is then adapted to the standard 21:9 cinema format by cropping, to remove part of the images. Thanks to the comments for this clarification!

In the cinema, you watch films in 21:9 whereas TV films are broadcast in 16:9. Simply put: the image is wider in cinema. To avoid cutting films produced for the cinema when they are shown on TV, black bands appear at the top and bottom of the screen. This gives the film a 16:9 format and allows it to play on our TVs.

The cinema format image - cinemascope - is wider than a 16:9 TV film image. Black bands therefore need to be added.
The cinema format image - cinemascope - is wider than a 16:9 TV film image. Black bands therefore need to be added.

Hollywood has named its cinema formats according to the number of pixels there are on the horizontal axis of the image. In other words, 2018 x 1080 pixels becomes 2K and 4096 x 2160 becomes 4K. Because the image is wider, it has around 0.6 million more pixels than conventional TV films.

DénominationDéfinition L x HRapport L x HNombre total de pixelsGénéralement utilisé pour
4K4096 × 2160 pixels~17:98 847 360Cinéma (21:9)
Ultra HD / UHD3840 × 2160 pixels16:98 294 400TV / Blu-Ray UHD
2K2048 × 1080 pixels~17:92 211 840Cinéma (21:9)
Full HD / FHD
1080p
1920 × 1080 pixels16:92 073 600TV / home-cinéma / Blu-Ray
High Definition / HD
720p
1280 × 720 pixels16:9921 600Majorité des contenus TV live

4K TVs are not 4K TVs

When manufacturers tout 4K definition, they promise a screen with around 8.8 million pixels spread across its entire surface. If we stick to the facts, this is a lie. As TV panels are built to suit the aspect ratio of a 16:9 TV movie, it's therefore physically impossible to have 4K definition, our TVs just aren't wide enough.

So the correct description would be UHD, because that is indeed the designation for this 16:9 definition. And these TVs actually have "only" 8.2 million pixels.

This is important. More pixels on a conventional UHD TV indicates higher density and is a definite advantage. But the number of pixels is exactly that of UHD. However, the manufacturer is promising 4K to its customers, so more than they will actually receive, without them realising it, as few know the difference between 4K and UHD.

Why isn't anyone reacting?

The problem: unlike ultra HD or even premium ultra HD, 4K is not regulated by minimum criteria or requirements. Manufacturers can therefore easily slap the 4K claim on their products without risking any concerns.

  • Background information

    Ultra HD Premium: What’s the point?

    by Luca Fontana

History repeats itself: 8K TVs are gradually making their way onto the market, but in fact only offer a definition of 7680 x 4320 pixels and are therefore not 8K TVs. So how do you tell? During my research, I came across the terms 'Super Hi-Vision' and 'UHD-2'. I'm going to stick with UHD-2 and add a column to my table.

DénominationDéfinition L x HRapport L x HNombre total de pixelsGénéralement utilisé pour
8K8192 × 4320 pixels~17:935 389 440Cinéma? Quelque part?
Super Hi-Vision / UHD-27680 × 4320 pixels16:933 177 600Prototypes, Samsung Q900R

Will "4K" ever be protected? I don't think so. In any case, until the general public is aware of the differences and encourages manufacturers to stop deceptive marketing, nothing will move.

Update 16.11.2018, 9:04am: You pointed out to me in the comments that digitec.ch also talks about 4K TVs when they're only UHD TVs and you're right!

190 people like this article


User Avatar
User Avatar

I'm an outdoorsy guy and enjoy sports that push me to the limit – now that’s what I call comfort zone! But I'm also about curling up in an armchair with books about ugly intrigue and sinister kingkillers. Being an avid cinema-goer, I’ve been known to rave about film scores for hours on end. I’ve always wanted to say: «I am Groot.» 


These articles might also interest you

Comments

Avatar