Background information

Strength training: which is more effective – concentric, eccentric or isometric training?

4.2.2022

Translation: Megan Cornish

Concentric, eccentric, isometric are three terms that have been floating around gyms for years. What’s behind them and why do some people only train using limiting movements? Is it more effective? We’ve got the answers.

According to sliding filament theory, muscle strength is built between actin and myosin filaments of muscle fibres [1].

What are we talking about?

Muscle action is the term for different biomechanical properties of actin and myosin filaments during activity. These filaments can either move towards each other (concentric), away from each other (eccentric) or not at all (isometric). The terms concentric, eccentric and isometric contractions were introduced to describe these different types of muscle action [2]. In contrast to the terms miometric (Greek for shortening) and pliometric (Greek for lengthening), the terms concentric and eccentric don’t reflect physiological functions. However, they’re still the dominant terms in the literature, so that’s what we’ve used in the rest of this article.
Mechanistically, concentric, eccentric and isometric muscle contractions are differentiated by their ability to build strength. Eccentric methods build between 20 and 50 per cent more strength than concentric ones [3]. Metabolically, eccentric training requires around six times less energy [4]. This means that eccentric contractions are more efficient than concentric contractions.

Concentric versus eccentric

The ability to build more strength during eccentric contractions lead to the hypothesis that this greater mechanical stress could have a bigger impact on hypertrophy or strength [5]. However, it’s important to underline that it’s difficult to link anabolic processes to one of the types of contraction because they have different muscle activations, recruiting, strength capacities and metabolisms.

With the aforementioned discrepancies in mind, Smith and Rutherford [6] used a study design where five men (20.6 ± 0.9 years of age) and five women (20.2 ± 1.3 years of age) trained one leg with concentric contractions of the quadriceps muscles and the other leg with eccentric contractions for 20 weeks. The stress for the eccentric contractions was 35 per cent higher than it was for the concentric contractions. The muscle cross-sectional area was determined using computer tomography. There was a significant increase in muscle mass in both groups. However, there was no significant difference between the legs. Multiple studies which looked at the types of contraction using direct measurements [6–12], lean body mass [13] and the amount [14] of muscle hypertrophy in untrained and trained participants showed no significant differences between them.

The conclusion can therefore be drawn that no clear indication of a superior effect of concentric or eccentric contraction on muscle hypertrophy has been observed [8, 15–21].

Isometric

Multiple studies have looked at isometric training. In 1987, Jones and Rutherford [22] compared the three types of contraction in a study design involving 12 untrained participants (11 men, one woman, 27.5 ± 6 years of age). Six people (five men, one woman) trained one leg with concentric contractions (80 per cent 1-RM, 2-3 seconds per rep) and the other with eccentric contractions (145 per cent 1-RM, 2-3 seconds per rep) on a leg extension machine. Six participants carried out isometric contractions on one leg – building strength without changing muscle length – while the other leg served as the control. All of the contraction types resulted in substantial increases in strength and hypertrophy with no significant differences between them.

Kubo et al. [23] studied the impact of the duration of isometric contractions on the elasticity of human tendons. Eight young men (22.6 ± 2.8 years of age) were also recruited and underwent 12 weeks of training. Muscle volume and strength were measured before and after the study. The researchers used a study design where one leg was assigned a longer contraction protocol and the other was allocated a shorter one. The protocol with a longer stress duration consisted of four sets of four contractions lasting 20 seconds each. The protocol with a shorter stress duration consisted of three sets of 50 reps with each contraction lasting one second. 70 per cent 1-RM was used. The study consisted of 12 weeks, with a training frequency of four days per week. Muscle volume was calculated using MRI. Both protocols resulted in a significant increase in maximum deliberate contraction strength and muscle volume without any significant differences between them.

Conclusion

Hypertrophy triggered by mechanical and metabolic stress can be induced by maximising the fibre recruitment time integral. It's clear that this be achieved via concentric, eccentric and isometric muscle contractions, although activation, recruitment, strength capacity and metabolism are different [24]. The latest literature doesn’t draw any conclusions about the superiority of one muscle action or other. This is why using all contraction types is recommended to increase muscle mass and strength [25].

References

Podolsky RJ, Schoenberg M. Force generation and shortening in skeletal muscle. Comprehensive Physiology. Hoboken, NJ, USA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.; 1983. pp. 173–187. doi:10.1002/cphy.cp100106
Wall PD, Karpovich P V. Physiology of Muscular Activity. AIBS Bull. Oxford University Press (OUP); 1960;10: 45. doi:10.2307/1292836
Petrella JK, Kim J -s., Cross JM, Kosek DJ, Bamman MM. Efficacy of myonuclear addition may explain differential myofiber growth among resistance-trained young and older men and women. AJP Endocrinol Metab. 2006;291: E937–E946. doi:10.1152/ajpendo.00190.2006
Hoppeler H. Moderate load eccentric exercise; A distinct novel training modality. Front Physiol. 2016;7. doi:10.3389/fphys.2016.00483
Roig M, O’Brien K, Kirk G, Murray R, McKinnon P, Shadgan B, et al. The effects of eccentric versus concentric resistance training on muscle strength and mass in healthy adults: A systematic review with meta-analysis. British Journal of Sports Medicine. 2009. pp. 556–568. doi:10.1136/bjsm.2008.051417
Carey Smith R, Rutherford OM. The role of metabolites in strength training - I. A comparison of eccentric and concentric contractions. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol. Springer-Verlag; 1995;71: 332–336. doi:10.1007/BF00240413
Blazevich AJ, Cannavan D, Coleman DR, Horne S. Influence of concentric and eccentric resistance training on architectural adaptation in human quadriceps muscles. J Appl Physiol. 2007;103: 1565–1575. doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.00578.2007
Farup J, Rahbek SK, Vendelbo MH, Matzon A, Hindhede J, Bejder A, et al. Whey protein hydrolysate augments tendon and muscle hypertrophy independent of resistance exercise contraction mode. Scand J Med Sci Sport. Wiley; 2014;24: 788–798. doi:10.1111/sms.12083
Moore DR, Young M, Phillips SM. Similar increases in muscle size and strength in young men after training with maximal shortening or lengthening contractions when matched for total work. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2012;112: 1587–1592. doi:10.1007/s00421-011-2078-x
Reeves ND, Maganaris CN, Longo S, Narici M V. Differential adaptations to eccentric versus conventional resistance training in older humans. Exp Physiol. Blackwell Publishing Ltd; 2009;94: 825–833. doi:10.1113/expphysiol.2009.046599
Franchi M V., Atherton PJ, Reeves ND, Flück M, Williams J, Mitchell WK, et al. Architectural, functional and molecular responses to concentric and eccentric loading in human skeletal muscle. Acta Physiol. Acta Physiol (Oxf); 2014;210: 642–654. doi:10.1111/apha.12225
Mamerow MM, Mettler JA, English KL, Casperson SL, Arentson-Lantz E, Sheffield-Moore M, et al. Dietary Protein Distribution Positively Influences 24-h Muscle Protein Synthesis in Healthy Adults. J Nutr. 2014;144: 876–880. doi:10.3945/jn.113.185280
Nickols-Richardson SM, Miller LE, Wootten DF, Ramp WK, Herbert WG. Concentric and eccentric isokinetic resistance training similarly increases muscular strength, fat-free soft tissue mass, and specific bone mineral measurements in young women. Osteoporos Int. 2007;18: 789–796. doi:10.1007/s00198-006-0305-9
Cadore EL, Izquierdo M, Pinto SS, Alberton CL, Pinto RS, Baroni BM, et al. Neuromuscular adaptations to concurrent training in the elderly: Effects of intrasession exercise sequence. Age (Omaha). 2013;35: 891–903. doi:10.1007/s11357-012-9405-y
Farthing JP, Chilibeck PD. The effects of eccentric and concentric training at different velocities on muscle hypertrophy. Eur J Appl Physiol. Springer; 2003;89: 578–586. doi:10.1007/s00421-003-0842-2
Higbie EJ, Cureton KJ, Warren GL, Prior BM. Effects of concentric and eccentric training on muscle strength, cross-sectional area, and neural activation. J Appl Physiol. American Physiological Society; 1996;81: 2173–2181. doi:10.1152/jappl.1996.81.5.2173
Hortobágyi T, Hill JP, Houmard JA, Fraser DD, Lambert NJ, Israel RG. Adaptive responses to muscle lengthening and shortening in humans. J Appl Physiol. American Physiological Society; 1996;80: 765–772. doi:10.1152/jappl.1996.80.3.765
Hortobágyi T, Dempsey L, Fraser D, Zheng D, Hamilton G, Lambert J, et al. Changes in muscle strength, muscle fibre size and myofibrillar gene expression after immobilization and retraining in humans. J Physiol. Cambridge University Press; 2000;524: 293–304. doi:10.1111/j.1469-7793.2000.00293.x
Mayhew TP, Rothstein JM, Finucane SD, Lamb RL. Muscular adaptation to concentric and eccentric exercise at equal power levels. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1995;27: 868–874. doi:10.1249/00005768-199506000-00011
Seger JY, Arvidsson B, Thorstensson A. Specific effects of eccentric and concentric training on muscle strength and morphology in humans. European Journal of Applied Physiology and Occupational Physiology. 1998. doi:10.1007/s004210050472
Vikne H, Refsnes PE, Ekmark M, Medbø JI, Gundersen V, Gundersen K. Muscular performance after concentric and eccentric exercise in trained men. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2006;38: 1770–1781. doi:10.1249/01.mss.0000229568.17284.ab
Jones DA, Rutherford OM. Human muscle strength training: the effects of three different regimens and the nature of the resultant changes. J Physiol. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd; 1987;391: 1–11. doi:10.1113/jphysiol.1987.sp016721
Kubo K, Kanehisa H, Fukunaga T. Effects of different duration isometric contractions on tendon elasticity in human quadriceps muscles. J Physiol. Wiley-Blackwell; 2001;536: 649–655. doi:10.1111/j.1469-7793.2001.0649c.xd
Franchi M V., Reeves ND, Narici M V. Skeletal muscle remodeling in response to eccentric vs. concentric loading: Morphological, molecular, and metabolic adaptations. Front Physiol. Frontiers; 2017;8: 447. doi:10.3389/fphys.2017.00447
ACSM, American College of Sports Medicine. Progression models in resistance training for healthy adults. Med Sci Sports Exerc. United States; 2009;41: 687–708. doi:10.1249/MSS.0b013e3181915670

Images: Shutterstock

14 people like this article

Claudio Viecelli

Biologe

claudio.viecelli@keyoniq.com

Molecular and Muscular Biologist. Researcher at ETH Zurich. Strength athlete.

Background information

Interesting facts about products, behind-the-scenes looks at manufacturers and deep-dives on interesting people.

Show all

These articles might also interest you

Background information
Strength training: What are the benefits of training to muscle failure?
by Claudio Viecelli
Background information
Strength training: muscles don’t count reps
by Claudio Viecelli
Background information
Strength training: how many sets does it take?
by Claudio Viecelli

2 comments

later

Your data. Your choice.

Search

Strength training: which is more effective – concentric, eccentric or isometric training?

What are we talking about?

Concentric versus eccentric

Isometric

Conclusion

References

These articles might also interest you

Strength training: What are the benefits of training to muscle failure?

Strength training: muscles don’t count reps

Strength training: how many sets does it take?

2 comments

Top 10 categories

Go to

2 comments

Galaxus Deal of the day